<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WP Pro - Design, Development and Professional WordPress Hosting for Serious Bloggers &#187; Internet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wppro.org/tag/internet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wppro.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 18:36:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is 1024px the new 800px for Web Design?</title>
		<link>http://www.wppro.org/2007/12/is-1024px-the-new-800px-for-web-design/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wppro.org/2007/12/is-1024px-the-new-800px-for-web-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.headsetoptions.org/2007/12/11/is-1024px-the-new-800px-for-web-design/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once the reboot was through on HeadsetOptions, I got mixed response from our users; so I went back to figure out once and for all if designing around 800px made sense anymore. As with ALA 4.0, most sites now support 1024px format or higher, no one talks or cares about 800px anymore. I didn&#8217;t have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once <a href="http://www.headsetoptions.org/2007/12/09/weekend-reboot-new-design-based-on-gluttony-by-small-potato/" title="site reboot on headsetoptions.org">the reboot</a> was through on HeadsetOptions, I got mixed response from our users; so I went back to figure out once and for all if designing around 800px made sense anymore. As with <a href="http://www.stuffandnonsense.co.uk/archives/a_list_taken_apart.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" title="ala author interview">ALA 4.0</a>, most sites now support 1024px format or higher, no one talks or cares about 800px anymore.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t have to look too far for evidence, it was close at hand, all within my user tracker.</p>
<p><img src="http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i136/headsetop/screenresolution.jpg" alt="screen resolution of users on headsetoptions.org" align="middle" height="280" width="450" /></p>
<p>The result &#8211; less than 2 percent of the users are viewing our site with 800px screens, the majority of the users use 1024px. So there you go, 1024px is the new 800px, so back to the drawing board. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wppro.org/2007/12/is-1024px-the-new-800px-for-web-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Al Gore&#039;s WordPress Powered Site Hacked</title>
		<link>http://www.wppro.org/2007/11/al-gores-wordpress-powered-site-hacked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wppro.org/2007/11/al-gores-wordpress-powered-site-hacked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.headsetoptions.org/2007/11/27/al-gores-wordpress-powered-site-hacked/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Al might think he &#8220;invented the internet&#8220;, but he sure failed to upgrade his WordPress inatall, which resulted in negative publicity for the best open CMS out there. His site was powered by version 2.0.4, which as Matt points out was released a good 16 months ago, and even beats the version I was running on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al might think he &#8220;<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://dir.salon.com/story/tech/col/rose/2000/10/05/gore_internet/index.html" title="al gore invented the internet">invented the internet</a>&#8220;, but he sure <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,139945-c,sites/article.html" title="PC World Article about Al Gore's Site">failed to upgrade his WordPress inatall</a>, which resulted in negative publicity for the best open CMS out there. His site was powered by version 2.0.4, which as <a target="_blank" href="http://photomatt.net/2007/11/27/al-gore-hacked/" title="Matt's post on Al Gore's site">Matt points out</a> was released a good 16 months ago, and even beats the <a href="http://www.headsetoptions.org/2007/11/06/improving-user-experience-with-small-site-enhancements/" title="improving user experience with small site enhancements">version I was running</a> on my other site just a few weeks ago (with my own patch nonetheless). My excuse, I did not invent the Internet! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wppro.org/2007/11/al-gores-wordpress-powered-site-hacked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

