<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WP Pro - Design, Development and Professional WordPress Hosting for Serious Bloggers &#187; Web Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wppro.org/category/web-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wppro.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 18:36:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>wpSnap Site Reboot</title>
		<link>http://www.wppro.org/2008/10/wpsnap-site-reboot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wppro.org/2008/10/wpsnap-site-reboot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 19:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.headsetoptions.org/?p=838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I started helping wpSnap on some of their technical issues last year, I realized that there was a lot of room to improve with the way conditional tags were written and addressed to produce the site that has among other things, featured listings, blogs and other WP themes all meshed into one pile of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I started helping wpSnap on some of their <a href="http://www.wpsnap.com/blog/2007/09/24/site-issues-and-theme-demo-down/" target="_blank">technical issues last year</a>, I realized that there was a lot of room to improve with the way conditional tags were written and addressed to produce the site that has among other things, featured listings, blogs and other WP themes all meshed into one pile of data in the backend. So when I was asked to redesign<sup><a href="#footnote1">1</a></sup> the site last month, I went a step ahead and offered to redo the backend as well.</p>
<p>The most prolific of issues on wpSnap (and other multi-author sites) seem to have stemmed from a new feature that was rolled into WordPress version 2.6, which was the creation of a new database table &#8220;per edit&#8221; to allow the option to rollback in the event the edit was made accidentally. What this does is that it clutters your database and loses the continuity that one would hope with your post ID numbers.</p>
<p>The clean up was a <a title="wp 2.6 post ID fix" href="http://lesterchan.net/wordpress/2008/07/17/how-to-turn-off-post-revision-in-wordpress-26/" target="_blank">hack of a sort</a> since it is not (yet) an option within the WP Admin panel that lets one turn off the auto save feature, also, since it is not a security issue, there is no reason why this feature/function might ever be reverted.</p>
<p>Aside from that, the conditional tags used were outdated and numerous loose ends that were not tied together, especially in pagination and navigation.</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 250px"><a href="http://www.wppro.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/wpsnapcom-old.jpg"><img src="http://www.wppro.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/wpsnapcom-old-188x300.jpg" alt="wpsnapcom-old" title="wpsnapcom-old" width="188" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-141" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">wpSnap Old Design (Click to enlarge)</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 250px"><a href="http://www.wppro.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/wpsnapcom-new.jpg"><img src="http://www.wppro.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/wpsnapcom-new-188x300.jpg" alt="wpsnapcom-new" title="wpsnapcom-new" width="188" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-142" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">wpSnap New Design (Click to enlarge)</p></div>
<div class="clear"></div>
<p>In all, there is no code on wpSnap now that existed per-reboot. We did recycle some graphics, logo, favicon and such. One major addition was the introduction of &#8220;<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.oiopublisher.com/" target="_blank">OIO Publisher</a>&#8221; advertisement management system to the main site and blog.</p>
<p>Also, wpSnap now sports a fresh new grid based visuals using the Blueprint CSS framework, which we have used on all commissioned work this year. Check the screenshot of the old design and compare it with the new look. Also, <a href="http://www.wpsnap.com/" target="_blank">visit wpSnap</a> and show some love, let them know what you think about <a href="http://www.wpsnap.com/2008/10/04/wpsnap-redesign/" target="_blank">the redesign</a> while you are there!</p>
<p class="footnote"><sup id="footnote1">1</sup>We are a <a href="http://www.headsetoptions.org/webdesign/">Richmond VA based web design studio</a> and accept work online and in the Greater Richmond Metroplitan Area!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wppro.org/2008/10/wpsnap-site-reboot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is 1024px the new 800px for Web Design?</title>
		<link>http://www.wppro.org/2007/12/is-1024px-the-new-800px-for-web-design/</link>
		<comments>http://www.wppro.org/2007/12/is-1024px-the-new-800px-for-web-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.headsetoptions.org/2007/12/11/is-1024px-the-new-800px-for-web-design/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once the reboot was through on HeadsetOptions, I got mixed response from our users; so I went back to figure out once and for all if designing around 800px made sense anymore. As with ALA 4.0, most sites now support 1024px format or higher, no one talks or cares about 800px anymore. I didn&#8217;t have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once <a href="http://www.headsetoptions.org/2007/12/09/weekend-reboot-new-design-based-on-gluttony-by-small-potato/" title="site reboot on headsetoptions.org">the reboot</a> was through on HeadsetOptions, I got mixed response from our users; so I went back to figure out once and for all if designing around 800px made sense anymore. As with <a href="http://www.stuffandnonsense.co.uk/archives/a_list_taken_apart.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow" title="ala author interview">ALA 4.0</a>, most sites now support 1024px format or higher, no one talks or cares about 800px anymore.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t have to look too far for evidence, it was close at hand, all within my user tracker.</p>
<p><img src="http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i136/headsetop/screenresolution.jpg" alt="screen resolution of users on headsetoptions.org" align="middle" height="280" width="450" /></p>
<p>The result &#8211; less than 2 percent of the users are viewing our site with 800px screens, the majority of the users use 1024px. So there you go, 1024px is the new 800px, so back to the drawing board. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.wppro.org/2007/12/is-1024px-the-new-800px-for-web-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

